Skip to main content

Organizations

Speaking Out on 4/20

You Can Make a Difference

 

Dear friends,

Speak out in support of marijuana legalization.  This 4/20 you can make a difference. Sign our public pledge supporting marijuana legalization. 

Take Action
Sign the Petition

This war won’t end if you stay silent.

4/20 is an important day for many people in our movement.  You may be one of the thousands of people gathering next week at rallies in Boston, Boulder, New York, Santa Cruz, Seattle and other cities.  Or maybe you just believe our country’s backwards marijuana laws need a major overhaul.

Whatever your plans on 4/20, let’s use the day to join together and declare our support for ending marijuana prohibition.  Click here to show your support for legalizing marijuana and help us reach 10,000 signatures by midnight, 4/20.

Maybe you smoke marijuana and are tired of being considered a criminal. Maybe you’re a teacher or public health advocate tired of politicians cutting money for education and health to pay for new jails and prisons.  Maybe you’re a civil rights activist appalled by racial disparities in marijuana law enforcement. Or maybe you just don’t want your tax dollars wasted on ineffective policies.

Now is the time to make your voice heard.  Sign our pledge and make a commitment to help legalize marijuana.  After you sign, tell 10 friends to add their voice.

Our movement includes people who love marijuana, people who hate marijuana, and people who don’t care one way or the other.  But we all agree on one thing – marijuana prohibition is doing more harm than good.

The tide is quickly turning against the war on marijuana.  Lawmakers across the country are introducing legislation to regulate marijuana like alcohol.  Newspapers are calling for major reform.  Sting and other prominent people are speaking out.  In November California voters will have the historic opportunity to vote on ending marijuana prohibition.

More Americans support legalizing marijuana than ever before, and it’s time for us to speak out.  Help us reach 10,000 signatures by midnight, 4/20 by signing our pledge to legalize marijuana.

Sincerely,

Bill Piper
Director, Office of National Affairs
Drug Policy Alliance Network

 

Americans for Safe Access: Choose Victory

 

Last week, when we began to unveil our strategy to win, we told you that we are committed to a 2013 victory-ensuring the framework for all Americans to have safe access to medical cannabis. We told you that we are going on the offensive; that we are through with putting out fires, responding to one narrow minded and misguided attack after another. We told you that this ends now and we are focused where we need to be on winning safe access, and winning it federally.
 
We wrote that over the course of this month, each week we would outline a different part of the strategy-our road map to win is divided into a series of core goals, and this week I want to tell you about
our top three national goals to assure safe access for every American.
 

1. Move the federal government to recognize the medical properties of marijuana.
 
2.  Create new federal polices to protect patients' rights by changing current federal policies for veterans and patients who live in government subsidized housing who legally use medical cannabis in their state.  
 
3. Dramatically increase our grassroots base of activists in key states, and across the nation, to compel federal action on the previous two goals.
 
We know that we have a 3 year window with this Administration (maybe longer, but we must be prepared for any political landscape).  While 14 states and the District of Columbia have passed medical cannabis laws there is still no safe access until federal law changes.  Our elected officials will not act unless we pressure them to do so.
Together we can make this happen!


Last week, we told you that in order for ASA to begin fully working towards a 2013 victory we needed to raise an additional $20,000-many of you responded so generously to that need and if you did, we thank you. It is because of your commitment to this movement that we are able to make these inroads, and it is your support that will catapult our movement to victory.


If you haven't given yet, it is my hope that you'll make a contribution today. We have raised a third of our budget for the year, but we still need to raise another $1.6 million to implement our strategy. Without your support, we will not see a 2013 victory. Our opponents are better funded than ever before, and we must match them dollar for dollar in this fight if we have any chance of winning. Your support will be what makes the difference between our movement forced into a defensive, reactionary position or a victory in 2013. Choose victory.
 
I'll be back next week with more of ASA's roadmap to win. Until then, thank you as always for your incredibly meaningful support.
 
In Solidarity,
 
Steph Sherer
Executive Director
 
PS
To thank those that gave last week, I'll be sending out an invitation to a private conference call with me where I'll discuss the strategic plan and answer any questions you may have. If you give before the end of today, we'll make sure you have a chance to be on that call.

Americans for Safe Access

Please support ASA!

On The Web:

ASA's Mission

ASA Forums

ASA Blog

Take Action

ASA's Online Store

"Gear up" for medical cannabis activism with ASA's new T-shirts, hats, stickers, bags and more! All proceeds go to ASA advocacy

LEAP's Annual Report

 


              Legalization and the War on Drugs:
        How 2009 Became the Year That Got Everyone Talking


ABOUT LEAP:

Founded in 2002 by five cops, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) is run and represented solely by those who fought on the front lines of the "war on drugs" and who know firsthand that prohibition only worsens drug addiction and street violence.

Today, LEAP has more than 30,000 supporters including police, prosecutors, judges, FBI/DEA agents, corrections officials, military personnel and civilians.

LEAP has members in 76 countries and its 100 speakers have helped to put a credible face on the modern anti-prohibition movement by giving more than 5,500 presentations to civic groups, public officials, members of the media and others. More information about LEAP is online at:

www.CopsSayLegalizeDrugs.com

Acknowledgements:
Report coordinator: Kristin Daley
Many thanks are due to the following individuals who provided invaluable assistance in the creation of this report: Tom Angell, Jack Cole, Peter Donna, Roger Falcón, Bill Fried, Michael Genovese, Antoinette Hartung and Shaleen Title


INTRODUCTION

At the end of 2008, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition released a report underscoring the feasibility of ending drug prohibition by pointing to a time 75 years earlier when our grandparents had the wisdom to legalize alcohol in order to stop violence and corruption, improve the economy and bolster public health. LEAP's Repeat Repeal report examined the parallels between alcohol prohibition and today's drug prohibition, calling on policymakers to consider drug legalization and regulation. As we look back on 2009 and the first months of 2010, it is clear that our message is really beginning to stick.

In 2009 it seemed that almost everyone was talking about legalizing drugs as a possible solution to the abysmal failure of the "war on drugs." Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senator Jim Webb, former Mexican president Vicente Fox, Mexico's current ambassador to the United States, Representative Charlie Rangel, Representative Barney Frank and political commentators Glenn Beck and Patrick Buchanan, among many others, said last year that legalization must be put on the table for discussion.

Yet we've seen much resistance from the White House, with Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske first claiming, in response to questioning by LEAP, that legalization wasn't even in his vocabulary and then, only months later, attempting to undermine legalization arguments via reference to a LEAP Washington Post op-ed during his remarks to the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

There has been a palpable shift away from the attitude that legalization won't or can't happen because it is somehow politically dangerous to acknowledge that the obvious solution to the "war on drugs" is to stop waging it, and we know - as many polls now bear out - that legalization can happen and that voters are much more ready for reform than even the most supportive politicians are prepared to understand. As we show below, there is substantial evidence that the old "drug war politics" are beginning to crumble. But if we are to clear the hurdles that stand between us and the end of prohibition, including important pending reforms, we will have to convince even more opinion leaders to reject the conventional wisdom about the perceived political danger associated with drug policy reform.

In fact, more and more people have begun talking about drug legalization, numerous incremental reforms are moving forward on the state and federal levels and we are beginning to see real models of effective regulation of marijuana distribution in California through the medical cannabis model, with the Obama administration voicing opposition to federal raids on medical marijuana distributors. Several countries around the world have decriminalized drug possession altogether. And yet the sky has not fallen; no politicians have been voted out of office because of their drug policy votes; in fact, drug abuse and problems tend to fall with the removal of punitive policies. It is increasingly clear that the debate on legalization has undergone a seismic shift and is moving forward.

LEAP has played a pivotal role in that shift.

Disenfranchisement News: Registered to Vote Before or After Conviction?

Disenfranchisement News

Sentencing Project

In this issue

·         Tennessee: Registered to Vote Before or After Conviction? » GO

·         National: College Press Takes Stance on Disenfranchisement » GO

·         Virginia: Is the Governor's Restoration Power a Conflict of Interest? » GO

 

Contact Us

Send an email to
The Sentencing Project.

The Sentencing Project
514 Tenth Street, NW
Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20004
202.628.0871

 

April 8, 2010

Disenfranchisement News

TENNESSEE

Registered to Vote Before or After Conviction?

An investigation has been opened by a District Attorney to learn whether eight individuals registered to vote after they were convicted, according to the Marshall County Tribune. If residents have not had their citizenship rights restored by a chancellor or a circuit court judge, they are banned from voting, according to State Elections Coordinator Mark Goins.

The Department of State's Office of the Elections Coordinator asked the Department of Corrections to compare its list of prisoners with the list of registered voters. The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is investigating whether or not any of the eight people, in fact, registered after a conviction or prior to being sentenced.

"If one of those people was registered to vote before their conviction, then they haven't violated the law because the conviction came after the registration," Goins said.

NATIONAL

College Press Takes Stance on Disenfranchisement

Howard University's student publication, The Hilltop, published an editorial in support of voting rights for individuals who have felony offenses on their records. The Hilltop's position is that the offenses individuals are charged with "shouldn't have anything to do with the rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution."

The editorial continues: "They are people and, more importantly in this case, American citizens, ergo their fundamental right to vote should be immediately restored upon the completion of their sentences."

VIRGINIA

Is the Governor's Restoration Power a Conflict of Interest?

In the News & Messenger, columnist Davon Gray poses several questions to readers regarding whether or not individuals should regain voting rights after they have completed their sentence. Though Gray doesn't support automatic restoration to all individuals, he does state that a different system than the one presently used in Virginia should be in place for rights restoration. "Personally I like the idea of the right to vote being restored on a case by case basis. What I don't like is the idea of a governor having sole ability to restore that right," he writes.

Gray goes on to say that rights restoration by a governor could pose a conflict of interest.  He writes that some cases should not warrant loss of voting rights upon completion of sentence.

"If someone steals a dog, should they face a lifetime ban on voting? … I would hate to see someone who has done their punishment for this trying to convince a governor they should have the right to vote back," he writes. "In this hypersensitive 24-hour news cycle we live in, watch groups are just waiting to exploit a politician for being soft on crime if he or she would give a convicted dog thief back the right to vote. The headlines wouldn't say 'Governor Restores Right to Vote for Dog Thief.'  It would be 'Governor Sides with Felon."

Back to top ^

The Sentencing Project is a national organization working for a fair and effective criminal justice system by promoting reforms in sentencing law and practice, and alternatives to incarceration.

 

Send a marijuana policy e-card today!

Marijuana Policy Project

Marijuana Policy Project Alert

April 7, 2010

Drop Shadow

MPP e-cards are here – send one today!

Send a card ... give the gift of marijuana policy reform!

Whether it's "happy birthday," "happy mother's day," or just "hello" – say it with an MPP e-card. Instead of the same old generic sentiments, now you can introduce a meaningful twist in all your card-sending.

For just a $10 donation, you can let family, friends, and loved ones know that you care about them and at the same time support ending marijuana prohibition.

Environmentally friendly, MPP e-cards let you express yourself in a greener fashion without paper, stamps, or postal delays ... and all the proceeds go directly towards MPP's work to change state and federal marijuana laws.

Visit the MPP e-card page to pick your design and message. And check back, since we'll be adding new ones in the future.

Send an MPP e-card today and spread the word to loved ones that marijuana policy reform matters!

 

Raised in '10:
$688,402
Goal in '10:
$2,700,000

MPP depends on the support of you and our other allies to fund our work.  Together we
will change marijuana laws.

Contributions to MPP are not tax-deductible. To make a tax-deductible contribution, click here.

Popular Links:

·         MPP's home page

·         MPP blog

·         MPP TV

·         FAQ

·         State-by-state medical marijuana laws

·         MPP news releases

·         2010 strategic plan

·         Download hand-outs

·         About the Marijuana Policy Project

·         MedicalMarijuanaProCon.org

·         Why donate?

 

 

 

Our mailing address is: 

MPP
236 Massachusetts Ave. NE, #400
Washington, DC 20002


We are required by federal law to tell you that any donations you make to MPP may be used for political purposes, such as supporting or opposing candidates for federal office.

 

Borderless Footer

Press Release: PhillyNORML Statement on Local Marijuana Change

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Rob Dougherty [email protected] Derek Rosenzweig [email protected] Chris Goldstein [email protected] Philadelphia is not decriminalizing pot Yesterday Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams announced a change in how minor marijuana possession offenses will be treated. To be clear: Philly is not decriminalizing cannabis. However, the shift in prosecutor and court procedures will treat marijuana consumers less harshly while saving the city a significant chunk of public safety resources. PhillyNORML welcomes the change. Arrests for minor marijuana offenses have been growing steadily over the last 5 years. In 2008 there were 4716 adults who faced the stand-alone violation of possession less than 30 grams. There is also a racial disparity to the arrests with over 70% being black men. Again, the pragmatic procedure shift cannot be described as "decriminalization" because Pennsylvania state law still classifies marijuana possession as the lowest level of criminal offense; a Class-A Criminal Misdemeanor. Specifically, the proposed procedure change for marijuana will see a policy made of common practice. Most offenders currently arrested for less than 30 grams in the city plead to disorderly conduct or other lesser offenses. This keeps a drug conviction off their record and allows for a more lenient sentence than the up to 30 days in jail that a pot conviction could net. DA Williams, with the backing of the state Supreme Court, are proposing to have offenders simply pay a fine and go to a diversionary court to streamline the process. This will immediately take the marijuana arrest burden off of the criminal courts. The proposed change would also result in a tangibly less traumatic experience for Philadelphia cannabis consumers who run afoul of prohibition laws. PhillyNORML welcomes an open debate with legislators and the public on the prospect of decriminalizing marijuana in Pennsylvania. There are almost 30,000 marijuana arrests in PA every year, most are for minor possession. www.phillynorml.org CONTACT: Chris Goldstein: [email protected]

Americans for Safe Access: April Activist Newsletter

 

In This Issue:

ASA Lays Out Strategy for Securing Safe Access for All

ASA Chapters and Affiliates Taking Action for Safe Access

D.C. Council Holds Hearing on Medical Marijuana

Medical Marijuana Bill Goes to Maryland Senate

ACTION ALERT: Tell Sen. Leahy to Challenge the DEA

Become an ASA Member!

Please support the work of Americans for Safe Access

On The Web:

ASA's Mission

What We Do

ASA Forums

ASA Blog

ASA YouTube

Legal Info

Take Action

Condition-Based Booklets

Join ASA Email Lists

ASA's Online Store

"Gear up" for medical cannabis activism with ASA's new T-shirts, hats, stickers, bags and more! All proceeds go to ASA advocacy

Americans for Safe Access

1322 Webster St., Ste. 402
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: 510-251-1856
Fax: 510-251-2036

Email us!

Americans for Safe Access
Monthly Activist Newsletter

April 2010

Volume 5, Issue 4


ASA Lays Out National Strategy to Win

Plan to Secure Safe Access for All Patients by 2013

This month, Americans for Safe Access is unveiling a new, three-year national plan for expanding safe access to medical cannabis. The multi-prong strategy for creating support at local, state and federal levels will be the centerpiece of "Preparing for Victory," a special series of workshops April 17-18 in Warwick, Rhode Island.

"ASA has worked with our lobbyists in DC and some of the sharpest legal minds in the country to develop a strategy to secure safe access nationally by 2003," said Steph Sherer, ASA Executive Director. "We're excited to share our plan to both fully implement state programs and establish a compassionate federal policy. There are roles for so many committed individuals and groups as we expand our successful grassroots efforts, build new coalitions with other advocacy groups, and pursue high-impact legal actions."

The workshops, which will help advocates build the political and strategic skills to make safe access a reality for patients everywhere in the country, follow the Sixth National Clinical Conference on Cannabis Therapeutics, which is being held April 15-17 in Warwick.

The national clinical conference, hosted by Patients Out of Time, includes a keynote address by the scientist who identified THC, Raphael Mechoulam, Ph.D., of Hebrew University in Israel, and a teleconference presentation by noted author and champion of holistic medicine Andrew Weil, M.D. The conference is part of a Continuing Medical Education series, partnering with the University of California.

"At the clinical conference, you will learn the science behind medical marijuana," said ASA Field Director Sanjeev Bery. "At ASA's workshops, you will build the political skills for securing safe access."

In addition to the workshops following the national clinical conference, ASA will be sharing key elements of the strategy with its membership through a series of weekly briefing emails this month.

Register now for ASA's Preparing for Victory workshops.

Back to Top


ASA Chapters and Affiliates Taking Action for Safe Access

ASA's chapters and affiliates across the country are busy with organizing and advocating on behalf of patients and caregivers in their areas. A few of the recent highlights of their activities include political lobbying in Michigan, California and Pennsylvania; signature gathering for an expansion of access in Oregon; and educating the community in New Jersey about the new state law.

On the grassroots lobbying front, in California the Silicon Valley ASA chapter has been organizing to convince the San Jose City Council to push forward an ordinance that would allow medicinal cannabis collectives to have storefront locations in that area. Patients and advocates attended the council meeting on March 30 to make their case.

In Michigan, the Metro Detroit ASA chapter has been engaging in lobbying and grass tops political activities with key politicians and opinion leaders, working closely with the Michigan ACLU, MPP and the Michigan Medical Marijuana Association on a statewide level. The Greater Flint ASA chapter, which has over 50 active members, has been more focused on grass roots activities in Michigan's Tri-City area of Flint, Bay City and Saginaw. The patient and caregiver community has been peacefully thriving in that area of the state, thanks to the excellent working relationship Flint ASA has developed with the Gennesse County Prosecutor.

In Pennsylvania, ASA affiliate Pennsylvanians for Medical Marijuana is working to push forward House Bill 1393, the Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act, which would allow patients and caregivers to cultivate and possess limited amounts of cannabis and establish state-licensed dispensaries. The group is holding a fundraiser on April 20 and a lobbying day in Harrisburg on April 21 so patients and advocates can visit their representatives. The House bill is awaiting a hearing before the Health and Human Services committee; a Senate version of the bill is expected sometime in May.

In New Jersey, the Coalition for Medical Marijuana--New Jersey (CMMNJ), an ASA affiliate, sponsored an informational town hall meeting to educate the community on the state's new medical cannabis law, which took effect in January. The "New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act" allows patients with qualifying conditions to possess and use of up to two ounces of marijuana a month with the recommendation of a licensed. Patients fighting such conditions as cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease can receive ID cards from the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services that will allow them to obtain cannabis from state-licensed Alternative Treatment Centers by July 2010. CMMNJ holds open, public meetings on the second Tuesday of each month at the Lawrence Twp. Library; the next meeting will be April 13.

In Oregon, ASA affiliate Voter Power is collecting signatures to qualify a medical marijuana initiative for the November ballot. Initiative 28 would create a system of state-regulated dispensaries and state-licensed medical marijuana producers. Dispensaries would have to be Oregon nonprofits and pay both a $2,000 license fee and a 10% tax on gross sales. Licensed producers would have to pay a $1,000 fee and the 10% tax. State-approved patients would be able to buy their supplies at any dispensary, and dispensaries would be able to buy from any licensed producer.

"The law works well for you if you live on a farm or can network with other patients, but if you're terminally ill in a hospice, you might be out of luck," said John Sajo of Voter Power, which also spearheaded the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act in 1998. "We'd like to do it like California, where patients can go to a dispensary and have myriad choices."

Advocates in Oregon need to submit 82,769 valid signatures by July 2 to make the November ballot. Organizers say they have over 90,000 signatures already and intend to file more than 120,000 by the end of May, leaving time to collect more if an unusually large number are ruled invalid.

Back to Top


D.C. Cannabis Law Enacted then Suspended

District Council Working on Regulations for Safe Access

The medical cannabis initiative in Washington, D.C. passed its mandatory 30-day Congressional review period last month but was immediately suspended by the local District Council so they can complete regulations for implementing the new law.

Initiative 59, known as the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative, was approved by 69% of voters in 1998 but blocked by Congress from taking effect then. That ban was lifted earlier this year.

"We're extremely pleased that Congress finally decided to allow the District of Columbia's medical marijuana law to take effect," said Nikolas Schiller from the D.C. chapter of ASA."We're also anxious to see the District Council quickly establish regulations that will grant voter-approved rights to patients, which have been denied for far too long."

The local moratorium follows a hearing last month on proposed amendments co-introduced by District Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray (D) and Councilmembers David A. Catania (I-At Large) and Phil Mendelson (D-At Large).

"The District Council needs to consider regulations from the patient perspective," said ASA Executive Director Steph Sherer, who is a DC resident. "Patients are not served by only allowing primary care physicians to recommend medical marijuana, limiting patients to a single caregiver, relegating dispensaries to remote areas, or jeopardizing sensitive patient information."

Once the Council adopts regulations, the law will undergo a second 30-day Congressional review period, as required under the Home Rule Act.

More Information:
Temporary moratorium passed by D.C. Council
Proposed D.C. legislation to implement I-59
Text of I-59, as passed in 1998

Back to Top


Medical Marijuana Bill Goes to Maryland Senate

Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Measure 7-4

The Maryland Senate Judiciary Committee sent to the full senate a bill that would expand the state’s medical cannabis law. By a margin of 7-4, the committee adopted provisions to protect patients from arrest and prosecution and reclassify cannabis as a Schedule II drug with accepted medical use.

ASA advocates were among those who helped convince committee members that they need to fix their state’s medical cannabis law.

"The Maryland legislature recognizes patients should not be treated like criminals," said Caren Woodson, ASA Government Affairs Director. "We are working to make sure they understand what it takes to meet the real needs of patients."

The new bill would make the state’s health department responsible for a medical marijuana program that would include licensing patients, caregivers, cultivators and distributors.

Maryland's current medical marijuana law reduces penalties for patients who present evidence of medical use in court to a $100 fine, but does not prevent them from being arrested, prosecuted or convicted.

A vote on Senate Bill 627 is expected within a week. The bill is a companion to House Bill 712, which was introduced by House Delegate Dan Morhaim M.D. If the senate bill passes, it will go to the House Rules Committee for consideration.

More information:
ASA Legislative Memo re: Maryland proposed law
Darrel Putnam Compassionate Use Act (current law)

Back to Top


ASA's roadmap to win

 

ASA will build the federal framework that will bring safe and legal access to all Americans by 2013.

For too long the medical marijuana movement has been forced into a reactionary and defensive position, constantly having to push back against outrageously unjust legislation our movement has been so busy fighting for what we don't want, we lost sight of how to fight for what we need. That ends today.

Our movement has come to a crossroads, for the first time we have a political climate that is ripe for this victory but without
your support we'll miss this historic opportunity and will be forced back to treading water, back to spending our time and resources fighting diminutive, petty legislators state-by-state, case-by-case. This is our chance to end all of that; this is our chance to win.

ASA needs to raise $20,000 in April to begin immediate work towards our 2013 goal. The reality is fighting offensively is more expensive than fighting defensively and our adversaries are counting on our inability to raise the money we need to win. We hope you'll prove them wrong.

Think of your contribution today not as a chartable donation but as an investment. When you
contribute you're insuring that you will be able to access the medicine you need free of persecution. Your contribution says that you're done living in fear, done just barely pushing back and ready to finish this fight once and for all.

ASA, in partnership with our lobbyists in DC and some of the sharpest legal minds in the country has developed an extensive roadmap to a 2013 victory. Our opposition knows that we're well within the sight of meeting this goal and they have become more strategic and better funded than ever, we must do the same. ASA has created an air-tight strategy; we need you to create the funding.

Over the next four weeks, we'll be unveiling our strategy to win. Each Thursday, for the month of April, you'll receive an e-mail update from us letting you know how close we are to our goal and giving you more information about our strategy and a detailed outline of our work plan. There will be ways to plug-in to the work and we'll look to you for help implementing the plan but today, today we need to raise that $20,000 and we need your contribution to get there. Because as soon as we reach $20,000-we'll begin this necessary and important work and get us one step closer to a 2013 victory.
Help us begin that work today!

More than ever, thank you for your support,

Steph Sherer
Executive Director

PS
We're inviting members who contribute today to a special conference call with me, Steph Sherer. I'll outline our strategy to win in 2013 and your questions on the call. 

Americans for Safe Access

Please support ASA!

On The Web:

ASA's Mission

ASA Forums

ASA Blog

Take Action

ASA's Online Store

"Gear up" for medical cannabis activism with ASA's new T-shirts, hats, stickers, bags and more! All proceeds go to ASA advocacy

 

We're Not Giving Up!

SSDP Action Alert

Call Congress Today!

Act now!
Ask your legislators to repeal the harmful Aid Elimination Penalty.

Dear Friends,

Over the past year you all have scored some huge national victories.  Not least among them helping to convince our long-time opponent Rep. Mark Souder (R-IN) to scale back the HEA Aid Elimination Penalty that he created over a decade ago.   

As you probably already know, in September 2009, The House of Representatives passed the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act (SAFRA), which included language that would repeal the Aid Elimination Penalty for students convicted of drug possession offenses.  

Since we know that many distribution cases are pleaded down to simple possession, this change will reinstate financial aid to a large number of students who would otherwise be affected by Souder's amendment.    

Last week Congress was poised to include the entirety of the SAFRA legislation into the health care reconciliation bill, including our provision. But I have some unfortunate news.  According to the rules of the now famous reconciliation process, amendments that directly change policy, as ours does, are subject to votes that require a 60 percent majority. So, in the eleventh hour, our amendment was taken out of the bill for procedural reasons.   

The good news is that this turn of events does not represent a lack of political will on the part of our allies in Congress . With leading Democrats devoted to changing this horrible provision - and with your letters and phone calls - I still believe we will successfully amend the Aid Elimination Penalty by the end of 2010.  We'll need to keep up the pressure, but I have every confidence that these recent events only delayed our inevitable victory. 

Sincerely, 

Matthew Palevsky

Acting Executive Director

Students for Sensible Drug Policy 

P.S. Do you want SSDP to continue pressuring Congress to ensure financial aid for students?  If so, help us by making a donation today so that we can hire a policy director to keep the pressure on our elected representatives in Washington.

http://www.ssdp.org/donate

Disenfranchisement News: Democracy Restoration Act - For and Against

Disenfranchisement News

Sentencing Project

In this issue

·         National: Democracy Restoration Act - For and Against » GO

·         Iowa: Arrested for Voting » GO

·         North Carolina: Eligible, but Vote Didn't Count » GO

 

Contact Us

Send an email to
The Sentencing Project.

The Sentencing Project
514 Tenth Street, NW
Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20004
202.628.0871

 

March 30, 2010

Disenfranchisement News

National

the Democracy Restoration Act - For and Against

Continuing to highlight the March 16 House Judiciary Committee hearing on the Democracy Restoration Act, coverage by Voice of America highlighted Marcus Martin and Andres Idaragga - two formerly incarcerated men who advocate for reenfranchisement. Martin, a Maryland resident, is not eligible for vote restoration until 2020.

"Whatever rights that a normal citizen should have, I believe I should have them as well since I've served my time and I'm back in society as a paying taxpayer and community activist," said Martin.

Idaragga's rights were restored in 2006 when the issue became a ballot referendum in Rhode Island. "Voting is particularly important because when we exclude people for voting, we're excluding them from the fundamental act of what it means to be a citizen," he said in an interview following his testimony before Congress earlier this month. Read Daily Kos for more on Idaragga.

Fox News' Glenn Beck commented on this week's New York Times editorial and the momentum behind the Democracy Restoration Act.

"Now, let me ask the New York Times: You are saying that we should restore - because you've paid your dues, you're going to restore the rights. All of them? Are you going to restore their right to the Second Amendment or is it only the voting rights?"

WorldNetDaily also featured an article highlighting an opposition point of view, which stated, "critics have also hinted that the law is politically convenient for Democrats." The Wall Street Journal featured a blog post on its Web site highlighting various media coverage and inviting comments on the issue.

For additional coverage, read the Huffington Post and the New American.


Iowa

Arrested for Voting

An Iowa resident was arrested this week for voting in the November 2008 election, according to the Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier. Kevin Prosper Janeau, who received probation for forgery in 2007, was officially discharged in October 2009 - a year after having cast his vote. Iowa law states that residents charged with an "infamous crime" - felonies and aggravated misdemeanors - lose their right to vote, according to the Governor's Office. According to officials, if a person attempts to register to vote when they don't have those rights restored, the Auditor's Office sends a letter to the person. Nonetheless, a county elections official said it's a "common occurrence" for ineligible people to apply for voter registration.

North Carolina

Eligible, but Vote Didn't Count

A federal judge in North Carolina recently ruled in favor of the Pasquotank County Board of Elections in a lawsuit filed by a resident who claimed he had been led to believe his vote would be counted in the primary election.
Peter Burke Sr.'s right to vote was restored in 2005 following a conviction, but he failed to register to vote prior to the May 2008 primary, the Daily Advance reported. Burke sought $1 million in damages and verification that his vote would be counted in future elections.

"It is undisputed that plaintiff failed to comply with the statutory requirement to re-register and was thus precluded by law from voting in the May 2008 Primary," Chief U.S. District Judge Louise W. Flanagan wrote. "In fact, plaintiff has not presented any evidence that defendant's conduct was due to discrimination based on his race."

Back to top ^

The Sentencing Project is a national organization working for a fair and effective criminal justice system by promoting reforms in sentencing law and practice, and alternatives to incarceration.