PRN files State Tort Claim vs. WA State - July 2008
PRN files State Tort Claim vs. WA State
Pain Relief Network files State Tort Claim vs. WA State; Alex DeLuca; War on Doctors/Pain Crisis blog of the Pain Relief Network; 2008/06/08. [Full text PDF]
See also:
PRN Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, and Damages - 2008
WAâs Interagency Guideline on Opioid Dosing for Non-Cancer Pain - 2007
SUMMARY:
Nature of Relief Sought This lawsuit is the result of grossly misinformed prejudices about opioid(1) pain medications held by high-level Washington public health officials. Those prejudices are identified in medical literature as opiophobia.(2) As a direct result of public health policies based on opiophobia, chronic pain patients in Washington are now unable reliably to secure necessary and appropriate treatment for their severe pain anywhere within the State of Washington. The dilemma of the chronic pain patients arises out of overreaching actions on behalf of senior public health officials, as well as that opiophobia - which has now permeated the entire Washington State health culture and also unlawfully influences medical licensing decisions.
 [Read the entire document in PDF format]
Â
'THE BALLAD' of Esequiel Hernandez on PBS
Pain Relief Network Sues State of Washington
Pain Treatment Advocacy Group Sues State of WA; Donna Gordon Blankinship; Associated Press; 2008-06-25.
See also:
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Damages
a class action lawsuit by Laura Cooper (lead attorney) et al., Filed: 2008-06-24Â
Exhibit 1: The WA state Opioid Dosing âGuidelinesâ
by Agency Medical Directors Group (AMDG); Mar. 2007; Filed 2008-06-24
-------Â
The nonprofit Pain Relief Network says the guidelines for prescribing narcotics, written by the Washington state Department of Health and published in March 2007, have influenced pain treatment across the country and have made doctors afraid to give opiate prescriptions.
Dr. Schneider's Pretrial Constitutional Motions in Judge's Hands
Dr. Schneiderâs Pretrial Constitutional Motions, Including Schneiderâs Response to Govtâs Opposition, in Judgeâs Hands; Alex DeLuca; War on Doctors/Pain Crisis blog of the Pain Relief Network; 2008-06-25.
Dr. Schneiderâs pretrial motions to dismiss on constitutional grounds, and his motions for abstention have been filed, as has the Governmentâs opposition to those motions, and Dr. Schneiderâs response to the Governmentâs opposition.
As I understand it, now we wait for rulings by the Judge.
The relevant briefs, and the Order releasing Dr. Schneider on bond and setting conditions on that release, are linked to, below. Dr. Schneiderâs wife Linda remains in jail as a âflight riskâ and is awaiting hearings on her detention and release.
Kick-ass Pretrial Motions:
Defendantsâ Memo and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Indictment as Unconstitutional
Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendantsâ Motion for Abstention
Defendantsâ Reply to Govtâs Response in Opposition to Defendantsâ Motions to Dismiss
Schneider Release Memorandum and Order
[END]