Latest
New Drug Czar Doesn't Care About Medical Marijuana
In an interview with National Journal, Gil Kerlikowske didn't have much to say about medical pot:
NJ: Do you have plans to review potential changes to the country's medical marijuana policies?
Kerlikowske: I have not had my meeting with the attorney general, who had made some statements, but I plan on following up with that pretty closely.
NJ: Will you at least be conducting a study on the topic?
Kerlikowske: I don't know. I think it is a little premature, and frankly, looking at the overdose deaths -- there is such a huge increase in people dying from prescription drug overdoses -- is a little higher on my priorities right now than the medical marijuana issue....
Well that makes sense, but considering that there's a raging controversy in America right now over the federal government's war on medical marijuana, maybe the drug czar should at least be able to provide a little insight instead of changing the subject. Of course, it's likely that Kerlikowske's attempts to downplay the issue are actually intended to dismiss potential controversy surrounding the new administration's positive statements on the issue, i.e. medical marijuana isn't a top concern, so don't give us a hard time for not raiding dispensaries.
This 'medical marijuana isn't a priority' stuff is fine for now if it means they won't be interfering with state laws, but it's a pretty weak cop-out in the long run. Eventually, Washington will have to come to terms with the deep unpopularity of the war on medical marijuana. That means declaring an end to federal raids based on firm moral and scientific grounds, rather than vague policy statements.
They seem to understand that public opinion requires a new direction with regards to medical marijuana policy, but if that much is understood, why tiptoe around it? If the goal is to avoid controversy, then tell us exactly what we want to hear, follow through on it, and the matter will be closed.
For starters, why not look into rescheduling marijuana so it isn't any more illegal than these FDA-approved pharmaceuticals that are killing so many people?
If Pure THC Pills are FDA-Approved, What's the Big Deal About Marijuana Potency?
Marinol is prescribed for treating vomiting in chemotherapy patients and other uses. It provides relief, not a high.
Says who? The first thing anyone who's ever taken Marinol will tell you is that the stuff gets you blasted for several hours. In fact, that's one of the primary reason patients prefer the herbal alternative. With marijuana, you can control your dose more effectively to achieve the desired effect. The spray was developed for the exact same reason, thus by suggesting that Marinol doesnât get you high, the NY Daily News completely misses the point of why a spray even exists. It's ridiculous.
We've heard this crap before and I just donât understand why anyone would struggle with the concept that a pure THC pill would make you high as hell. I suppose it's a convenient claim for pharmaceutical execs trying to separate their product from its controversial context and it's certainly convenient for drug warriors desperately endeavoring to explain why one is medicine and the other is poison. But it's bullshit and it shouldnât take a scientist to deduce that you will not remain sober after swallowing concentrated THC. That's like saying heroin gets you high but synthetic opiates don't.
Hilariously, there's a side column of "relevant articles" on the page with the top item titled Marijuana Potency Higher Than Ever. We're actually supposed to be intrigued and perhaps alarmed by the fact that domestic marijuana potency now averages 10% THC, meanwhile the FDA has long approved a 100% THC pill that's proven to be completely safe in every way, except that some people think it's a little too strong and want weed instead.
It's amazing the lengths some people will take to rationalize the mindless paradox of arresting medical marijuana patients while simultaneously trying to sell them potent THC pills.
Job Opportunity: National Field Coordinator, Americans for Safe Access, Oakland, California
Law Enforcement: This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
Europe: Dutch Plan to Reduce Amsterdam Coffee Shop Numbers in Bid to Clean Up City Center
Europe: Danish Court Says Christiania Residents Have No Right to It
Latin America: Attacks Made on Candidates from Mexican Party That Favors Drug Legalization
Law Enforcement: Supreme Court Holds Drug Purchasers Can't Be Charged With "Facilitation" Felonies for Calling Drug Dealers
Public Opinion: Rasmussen Poll Finds 41% Favor Legalizing and Taxing Marijuana
Medical Marijuana: New York Bill Wins Senate Committee Vote
Feature: Effort to Bring Safe Injection Facility to New York City Getting Underway
Medical Marijuana: Bill Passes Illinois Senate, Heads to House
Feature: Health Canada Adjusts Medical Marijuana Program, Doubles Number of People Providers Can Grow For -- From One to Two
Weekly: This Week in History
Please: Don't Shoot!
Students: Intern at StoptheDrugWar.org (DRCNet) and Help Stop the Drug War!
Weekly: Blogging @ the Speakeasy
Press Release -- NYCLU to School District: Mass Student Search Illegal, Humiliating & Invasive
CONTACT: Jennifer Carnig, 212.607.3363 / [email protected]
NYCLU to School District: Mass Student Search Illegal, Humiliating & Invasive
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 28, 2009 â The New York Civil Liberties Union has called on the Red Creek Central School District in upstate New York to publicly apologize to high school students subjected to illegal, humiliating and invasive searches by state police and school officials.
In a letter to Superintendent David Sholes, the NYCLU also urged the district to take steps to prevent invasive searches and protect studentsâ rights. Students subjected to the April 9 searches were passengers on a school bus parked outside of Red Creek High School. Every student was pulled off the bus and searched.
âThis was one of the most humiliating moments of my life,â said 18-year-old graduating senior Stephanie Schultz, who is attending college in the fall. âMy school taught me about the Constitution and about my rights, and then pushed them both aside and made me feel like my rights didnât matter.â
Schultz and at least 17 other students on a Williamson BOCES school bus were removed from the bus in mixed gender pairs and ordered to the Red Creek High School principalâs office by a uniformed state trooper. In the principalâs office, the students, male and female, were subjected to invasive searches in full view of each other.
Schultz was searched by a female librarian in front of three males â her principal, a police officer and a classmate. Though she asked that she be searched in a room without men, her request was denied. She cried as she was forced to roll down her waistband and expose part of her underwear and buttocks.
âThe principal walked out because I was crying so much,â Schultz said. âI knew it wasnât right what was happening, but there was nothing I could to. I felt helpless and humiliated.â
Nothing was found on the culinary arts student. In fact, the school district did not have suspicion that any of the students searched were engaged in any illegal activity at that time.
âStudents must not be stripped of their rights and their dignity at the schoolhouse door,â NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said. âWhile drug abuse is a serious matter, it can be addressed without public humiliation. These students are now afraid of their teachers, they are afraid of the police, and they are afraid of what their classmates think of them. They deserve a public apology to ease these fears and restore their reputations.â
The male students were searched by Principal Noel Patterson as a state trooper watched. Female students were searched just a few feet away by a female school employee. Each student was ordered to remove their jacket, shoes and socks, and empty their pockets. Some students were âpatted down,â others were asked to lift shirts and undershirts, and one student was asked to remove an outer pair of pants.
âThis was humiliating, embarrassing, frustrating and a waste of my time,â said 18-year-old graduating senior and honor roll student Stephanie Forsythe. âEveryone saw me escorted by the police and thought I was arrested. I shouldnât have had to go through that and I donât want this to happen to my little siblings.â
According to the district, each student was subjected to a âwaistband search,â which in some cases entailed turning down the waistband to reveal parts of their underwear, buttocks and pelvic area, in view of male and female school staff and the male state trooper. Backpacks, purses and other containers were also searched. At least one student was charged criminally and suspended for a year.
The NYCLU maintains that the searches violated the studentsâ rights under both the U.S. and New York State constitutions. The April 9 searches of the BOCES students were not based on individualized suspicion that any particular student was engaged in illegal behavior at the time of the search. Moreover, even if the school district had adequate ground for a search, the search that was conducted was far more intrusive and humiliating than is constitutionally permissible.
âEducators should know better than to do this to kids,â said Tim Cosser, whose 17-year-old son was searched. âI know they have to keep schools safe, but I donât understand this. Itâs not right. The district needs new guidelines that protect studentsâ rights.â
In light of the constitutional violations that occurred on April 9, the NYCLU urges the district to take the following steps:
·        Issue a public apology making clear to the community that the vast majority of the students on the bus were guilty of no wrongdoing and acknowledging the illegality of the searches.
·        Revise its policy on student searches to state that no reasonable search may be conducted without individualized suspicion of wrongdoing. Individualized suspicion must be based on facts known to the official about the particular student that support a belief that a search will uncover evidence of a crime or violation.
·        Clarify and enhance its memorandum of understanding with the New York State Police with the goal of with the goal of creating clear guidelines for police and school officials that protects student rights.
·        Provide all school district employees who may be involved in student searches and interrogations annual training on studentsâ rights.
The district covers the towns of Butler and Wolcott in Wayne County and the village of Fair Haven and parts of Victory, Sterling and Conquest in Cayuga County.
To read the NYCLUâs full letter, visit http://www.nyclu.org/node/2411.
-xxx-Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 600
- 601
- 602
- 603
- 604
- …
- Next page
- Last page