Our Motion for Remand was denied on May 16, 2007 as we expected . The Motion was based on the errors our second attorney made . Some of those errors are pointed out in reference material, see: OSB disciplinary. My father and I were instructed by the attorney, our testimony concerning my son’s Motion for new Attorney would not be needed . Only after we lost the trial, did we learn our testimony could not be allowed in the appeal....... because we did not testify . The Motion for Remand was our last hope to testify.
The written transcripts to the Motion for new Attorney are incorrect . See reference material : Audio Record, notice the difference in the time reading. My father, my son and I were all present on Feb. 11 2002 and we were shocked by something our Attorney said . I purchased the tape
recorded transcripts by Fran Hooten . This tape was correct and had no static, we heard Mr.Coggins repeat his statement over and over again . Mom who once worked in the Judge Advocate Generals office, said Judge Barron should have removed Mr.Coggins from the case, for
defending the credibility of the confidential informant .
Due to the fact that we will not be testifying in a court of law, I will begin testifying here and will include my story and experiences along the way. My site has just been renewed and I will be posting soon. I believe we can all learn something from my story, please feel free to check in once and a while . note Judge Barron Letter
Lowell V. Keef Jr. http://scint-stinks.com
Looking for the easiest way to join the anti-drug war movement? You've found it!
Post new comment