Johnny Pee's blog states that testing is now taking place in over 1000 schools in the USA.That would mean that millions of young students are subjected to this humiliating search of their body fluids. Mr. Pee's blog also states that the cost for this program would be "somewhere between $10 and $50 each. If the 1000 schools presently given over to this invasion enroll 1000 students each, that would mean that the program costs about $25 million at this point in time. Big bucks for the testing industry. Of course will they test each and every student? I'm certain they have more in the planning. Pee for your education. Pee for your job. What next? Pee for your mortgage? Your drivers license? And what can be said about the observer of the given test? Maybe that said person would be just a toe tap away from some big problems. This whole URINENATION thing really piss'es me off.

The problem I have with the testing is that it can be flawed. Nothing is 100% (as witnessed by the innocent people sent to jail) If drug testing cannot be 100% correct, why would we use it. Is it worth throwing away those kids lives, that get false positives? Not in my world. We all have value! Destroying ANY PART of our community, with false accusations, is abominable! Anyway, the kids can get drugs easier than they can get alcohol and cigarettes!! Does that tell us something? I, happen to, think so. Dealers don't card!

And why in the heck should the school ground drug laws, that add years of punishment onto the regular drug sentences, apply to kids! The kids are required to be there, by law. Was this law not made to encourage drug dealers to keep their distance from schools (drug free zones! HA!)?

DO you poeple see this? inspite of masive support to legalize madical marajuana they STILL keep it illegal !!!! We the poeple of the usa no longer have ANY say so on how our country is being run,, How long are we going to just stand by and let these babbeling boobs run our country??if 60% (numbers say a lot more then that)say it should be then it SHOULD be legal
What we have here is the brainwashing of the early 40's on "refer madness" worked to will ,, only shows the power the goverment has over us , myself I refuse to vote for ANY of the canadates ,, they ALL say what you want to hear to get in office , then its "oh I didn't say that , I said this" they all lie to get into office

The people responsible for these laws are under the influence of the real drug which is now and always has been power. They can rationalize this hypocracy because they are ignorant of the fact that all of the worst crimes that have ever taken place on this planet happened because of people who were under the influence of a perverted sense of power usually having something to do with one of the many false religions. Considering the fact that this country was established on lies, genocide and massive self deception and that we somehow think that the rest of the world is blind and insanely ignorant to not comprehend that we are a third rate empire whose goal is to establish an orwellian totalitarian state while hiding behind a facade of democracy.

When I lived in Greenville, North Carolina, Marines up from Camp Lejeune were always asking where could they find crack. Why? Because it didn't show up on drug tests.

What reality is he proposing we face? That people are going to do drugs no matter what laws or tests we implement?

Do you think that High School drug dealers are going to start selling fixes of detox pills along with someone's bag, in case there is a random test day at school? Conspiracy to prevent suspension?

Vote Ron Paul. end the insane fight against you.. i mean, drugs

While driving in Ohio, I was stopped by a cowboy cop for speeding. Unfortunately, he also tried to pin a DWI rap on me. He called for a cop to administer a breath test. While waiting, he tried to coerce me into admitting that I was drunk. He told me that it would go easier on me if I co-operated. He watched too many cop shows on TV. A breath test indicated that I had no alcohol in my system. That wasn't the end of it. The cowboy cop arrested me for driving while impaired. THis meant that I had to go to headquarters and submit to a urine test. He also conviscated my drivers licence, even though I wasn't convicted of anything. Three months later I got word that the driving while impaired charges were dropped. Unfortunately, the cowboy cop is still patrolling. How many people he coerced into admitting that they were driving under drug or alcohol influence is unknown. He should have his badge taken away from him. The cop used drug testing on innocent people to move up in the ranks. Let's end that.

I Brian Frost now refuse any drug test no matter the consequence. Since puberty I've realized the benefits of reefers, putting up with the ignorance and blind ambition of the government. To keep myself from being a lifelong criminal i have removed myself from near the top to as far as rock bottom as i can allow. The only reason is to keep from being caught. Innocent untill proven guilty, tell me where and maybe i'll try to move there because it shurely isn't ohio and from what i hear it isn't antwhere on the current globe!

n 2005, in a vote of 6-3 (ironically Thomas joining the dissent), the court held that the Congressional ban on homegrown marijuana was authorized by the Constitution because if people could grow their own, the price of black market weed would lower, and increase the likelihood that others could buy marijuana. (Note the parallel, as prostitution is banned, consensual, non-commercial sex can be criminalized, because the more often that people have sex for free - especially if they are married, the lower the price that prostitutes will charge).
But nowhere in these cases did the courts start with the question demanded by Alexander Hamilton ,does the Constitution explicitly authorize the government authorized to deny said individual activity?" If we pose the questions this way, the answer is obvious - Congress cannot authorize and the executive cannot enforce bans on marijuana use, especially when used as a medicinal aid to improve one's life. What is the purpose of government, but to improve the quality of our lives? Thus Pregerson's determination that nothing allows the court to enjoin the feds from harassing and arresting people like Raich is WRONG. Courts can always declare laws and or their enforcement as unconstitutional and issue a cease and desist order. What he is really saying is that he does not want to do so. After all, it is hard to advance in government if you are not a kiss up, just ask former federal prosecutor Carol Lam or Alberto Gonzalez.
Karl Marx (a materialist) declared that he took the ideas of Hegel (the idealist) and turned them right side-up. Marx believed that one's material existence informs our ideas about right and wrong, thoughts on physics, religion, the value of labor and so forth. When we look at the state of American jurisprudence, for nearly 200 years, the legal community has ignored the material reality of the Constitution and the Federalist papers, but instead pushed false ideals. We must retrain law students, professors, lawyers and judges to read the Constitution right side up and acknowledge that our government is supposed to be that of a sovereign people, coupled with a government of express and limited powers. In application, this means that there is no grant for the government to punish people like Angel Raich - they cannot take her stash, arrest her, issue fines or keep her in prison. It even means that all laws banning adults from possessing or growing marijuana are unconstitutional as well.

The powers of govt. ,under our system , are nowhere absolute. They are but grants of authority from the people ...The fundamental rights of the people are inherent and have not been yielded to governmental control ..Constitutional powers can never transcend constitutional rights . The police power is subject to the limitations of the constitutions Spann vs. City of Dallas 235 S.W. 513,515

"[An] act of the Congress of the United States... which assumes powers... not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void and of no force." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. ME 17:383

When our Constitution was first established, it was assumed that the description of specific powers granted to the government would leave no doubt as to what the government could and could not do, and that the absence of powers over the rights of the people would leave those rights protected. But Jefferson and others were wary of leaving such important matters up to inference. They insisted on a Bill of Rights that would state in unmistakable terms those rights of the people that must be left inviolate.

"[If] it [were] assumed that the general government has a right to exercise all powers which may be for the 'general welfare,' that [would include] all the legitimate powers of government, since no government has a legitimate right to do what is not for the welfare of the governed." --Thomas Jefferson to George Washington, 1792. ME 8:397

If the current regime aren't actually heroic patriots? Maybe they're secretely trying to see how many rights they will be allowed to steal from Americans before we wake up and realize that we can no longer bear another infringement on our rights! Maybe they're secretely trying to push us to actually take responsibility for and value our freedom!

Seriously, though, I doubt it. People like Walters and Bush are addicted to POWER, the most nefarious of ALL drugs...