Skip to main content

Virginia Welfare Drug Testing Bill Defeated

Submitted by Phillip Smith on (Issue #770)
Drug War Issues
Politics & Advocacy

A bill backed by Republicans that would have required drug screening and testing of welfare recipients died Monday in the Virginia Senate. The measure failed by one vote in the evenly divided Senate when one Republican didn't vote.

Last year, a similar measure ended up with a tied vote in the Senate, allowing Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling to cast a tie-breaking vote and advance the bill to the House. It was then killed in the House.

The measure, Senate Bill 271, introduced by Sen. Charles Carrico (R-Grayson), would have required the state's welfare-to-work program to screen participants "to determine if probable cause exists to believe the participant is using illegal substances" and, if such a determination is made, "a formal substance abuse assessment of the participant, which may include drug testing."

Those who tested positive would have to enter a drug treatment program or lose benefits for a year. Those who refused to be tested would also lose benefits for a year.

Similar legislation is afoot in a number of other states. Some states, like Virginia, have attempted to overcome constitutional problems with suspicionless drug testing by providing for an initial screening to come up with probable cause, but even that fix hasn't managed to overcome political problems in most states.

Opponents of such legislation argue that such programs cost more money than they save, that they are an attack on poor people, and that there is no evidence of widespread drug use among public benefits recipients.

"Why are poor people singled out for testing," asked Sen. Marnie Locke (D-Hampton) before voting against the bill. "Why not legislators or bailed-out CEOs?"

Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Comments

Chris o (not verified)

Id be all for it if it saves tax dollars it doesnt save a dime its costs money this is nothing more than a give away to the drug testing companies...... The only drug you can catch is cannabis so unless you plan on testing people every 24hrs this is a huge waste of tax dollars
Thu, 02/07/2013 - 1:58am Permalink
kickback (not verified)

Every member of Congress has a family member that uses Cannabis . Every cop . Every prosecutor . Every judge . Do people like to use Cannabis ? Of course they do . Well why don`t we just start up a " drug testing " scheme ? Imagine telling your kids that they will grow up and become human excrement technicians . What a thrill . Give me a 5 gallon bucket and I`ll give you something to play with ..

Thu, 02/07/2013 - 3:59am Permalink

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.